Skip to content
man bot
Compare

Technicians and associate professionals · code 3153

Aircraft pilots and related associate professionals

Autopilot flies most of the trip. A pilot handles everything the autopilot can't.

Flight plans, certificates and flight records are mostly out of AI's reach. Solving problems mid-flight and inspecting the aircraft it barely touches.

What they actually do (and what else they get called)

Aircraft pilots and related associate professionals control the operation of mechanical, electrical and electronic equipment, in order to navigate aircraft for transporting passengers, mail and freight and perform related pre-flight and in-flight tasks. Tasks include - (a) flying and navigating aircraft in accordance with established control and operating procedures; (b) preparing and submitting flight plans or examining standard flight plans; (c) controlling the operation of mechanical, electrical and electronic equipment and ensuring that all instruments and controls work properly; (d) applying knowledge of principles and practices of flying in order to identify and solve problems arising in the course of their work; (e) examining maintenance records and conducting inspections to ensure that aircraft are mechanically sound, maintenance has been performed and that all equipment is operational; (f) signing necessary certificates and maintaining official records of flight; (g) obtaining briefings and clearances before flights and maintaining contact with air traffic or flight control during flight. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Aerial crop sprayer - Flight engineer - Flying instructor - Navigator (flight) - Pilot (aircraft)

  • aircraft pilot
  • aircraft maintenance engineer
  • astronaut

Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.

73 / 100

Mostly holds up against AI

AI can take a few chores off your plate, but most of the day is still yours.

Not the odds you keep your job. It's how much of the everyday work still needs a person, out of 100.

← Robot's turf Human's turf →

The ILO's official verdict: Not Exposed

216 of 427 for holding up against AI

Why this score?

The ILO rated each of this job's 7 tasks for how much of it AI could do. They average 27.4 out of 100, so it holds up at 100 − 27.4 = 72.6.

That's the whole sum. No black box, no secret sauce: you can check it against the ILO's study. ILO group “Not Exposed”: None of this job's tasks scored high enough to count.

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Pinch of salt: this number is probably too rosy

It only asks what AI software could do, and this job is 66 out of 100 hands-on. A chatbot can't do that part. A robot might, one day, and nobody measures how close that is.

Man v Bot · compare

Who holds up better?

Aircraft pilots and related associate professionals 73

v

Go on, try your partner's job. Or your sibling's. We won't tell.

Man v Bot

Where the bot helps, and where the human wins

Bot

What AI takes

The routine stuff. You may not miss it.

  • Flight planning and paperwork.
  • Weather and route briefings.
  • Monitoring aircraft systems.

Man

What people still do better

Judgement, trust and skilled hands. Hard to download.

  • Flying and handling emergencies.
  • Judgement when things go wrong.
  • Responsibility for passengers and crew.

Both

What's arriving

New work that only exists because the AI does.

  • Drone and remotely piloted aircraft operation.
  • Electric and hybrid aircraft.
  • Debates about single-pilot operations.

Written by a human, from the ILO's task ratings below. Yes, we see the irony. Read it as one person's take.

Meet your two rivals

They're not the same machine. AI software can only reach the parts of a job done on a screen or in words. A chatbot can't climb a ladder. A robot might, one day, if it doesn't fall off.

The AI

Lives in a screen. Never had to fix a boiler.

Threat level: Low

31 could do without you

It could take over very little of the work on its own. It could help with 60 of 100.

The robot

The wildcard. Has hands, still working out stairs.

How much it matters here: Higher

66 how hands-on

Most of this job needs hands, a body or turning up. That's robot territory, and nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to give you a number. We won't make one up.

So could a robot do the physical part?

More fine handwork, and more time in cramped or awkward spots, than a typical hands-on job. That is exactly what machines find hardest: they do best in tidy, predictable places.

Robots hate fiddly work in awkward spaces. On that measure, this job scores 40 out of 100. The higher it is, the longer the robot waits.

66 How
hands-on
40 How fiddly
and cramped

Kind of hands-on work Hands-on, fiddly work in tight spaces

The small print

They aren't a robot score, and nothing on this page is. Nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to put a number on it. These are the closest thing we have: how hands-on the job is, and how much fiddly, cramped work it takes, which is what Frey and Osborne found hardest for machines.

From O*NET, averaged across 4 US jobs .

finger skill 39.9 · hand skill 41.3 · cramped spaces 39.4 · averaged · rule: hands-on 50+ · fiddly 39.4+

estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.8-observed-use measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement

The job, task by task

Every job is really a bundle of tasks. Here's this one unpacked, with how much of each AI could do, out of 100. The score is the average, and averages can hide a lot.

AI's favourite task here scores 35, against an average of 27. The bigger the gap, the more lopsided the job: some of it wide open to AI, some of it barely touched.

  1. 35

    Preparing and submitting flight plan or examining standard flight plan

    Low
  2. 33

    Signing necessary certificates and maintaining official records of flight

    Low
  3. 31

    Obtaining briefings and clearances before flights and maintaining contact with air traffic or flight control during flight.

    Low
  4. 26

    Controlling the operation of mechanical, electrical and electronic equipment and ensuring that all instruments and controls work properly

    Low
  5. 24

    Flying and navigating aircraft in accordance with established control and operating procedures

    Very Low
  6. 22

    Applying knowledge of principles and practices of flying in order to identify and solve problems arising in the course of their work

    Very Low
  7. 22

    Examining maintenance records and conducting inspections to ensure that aircraft are mechanically sound, maintenance has been performed and that all equipment is operational.

    Very Low

7 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Sidekick or replacement?

A tool that makes you faster is a very different thing from one that does the task while you watch. Jobs and Skills Australia measured the two separately, which is handy.

AI helps you
60
AI does it for you
31

Sidekick wins, by 29 points.

How good a match is this?

One Australian job matches, but only partly: not everyone in it does this job. Treat the numbers as a rough guide.

estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.8-observed-use matched to Australian jobs 2311

Meanwhile, in real life…

Everything else here is about what AI could do. This is what people actually did. When they asked Claude for help with this kind of work, did they hand the whole task over, or roll their sleeves up and work through it together?

Tiny sample alert This job makes up 0.03% of all the conversations: a tiny slice, mostly the paperwork rather than the work. People using AI for a job isn't the same as AI being able to do it.

Out of every 100 conversations

37
63

worked through it together handed it over

The small print

Anthropic publishes this about its own product, and it doesn't feed into any score here. These are people who use Claude, not workers in general, so little use here doesn't mean AI can't reach the job.

The data is sorted by US job, and this one matches 2 of them. We've combined them, counting each by how often it comes up in the conversations, so the busiest one counts most.

These two add up to 100. The bars elsewhere on the page don't, because each is scored on its own, so we don't put them side by side.

observed use Anthropic Economic Index release 2026-06-26, period beginning 2026-05-01 data 0.8-observed-use 2026-05-01 · Anthropic, about its own product

So, should pilots be worried?

Short answer: not much. Some of the chores will change, and good riddance.

No. Flight plans, certificates, briefings and monitoring systems are the most exposed tasks, all Low; flying, navigating and solving problems in the air rate Very Low. Automation already does a lot in cruise, and AI will take on planning; responsibility for the aircraft stays with pilots.

Worth remembering: we score tasks, not jobs. When AI takes on a task, the job usually reshuffles around it rather than vanishing.

Where this job could lead

None of the new jobs we've written up start from here yet. Could be you're the first. See the jobs AI is creating →

How are the neighbours doing?

There are 82 jobs in the “Technicians and associate professionals” family, averaging 65. This one is above the family average.

Pit this against any other job →