ISCO 2642 · O*NET 27-3043.05 · codes unverified
Copywriter
The occupation most people picture when they picture AI taking a job, and one of the few where that picture is broadly right.
Most of what this job was is being rebuilt. What replaces it is a different job with the same name.
Scale, labels and thresholds are provisional. This is open question Q-02.
18 of 20 in the launch set
How the score is made
Four declared inputs, never collapsed into one number. Assistance is kept apart from outright automation, because a tool that makes you faster and a tool that replaces you are not the same event. Physical work counts as shelter only to the extent robotics cannot reach it.
The full method is written out, including what it cannot tell you.
Note on this occupation ISCO-08 has no dedicated copywriter unit; this sits under journalists, which is a poor fit and a good example of why the classification note matters. O*NET separates the writing roles more usefully.
- Assisted
- 86
- Done outright
- 78
- Physical
- 4
- Robotics reach
- 30
Higher is generally good news. It means more of the work gets faster without the work going away.
This is the number most people mean when they say exposure. It is kept separate from assistance on purpose.
Protective only for as long as robotics cannot reach it. Read this one next to the robotics number, never alone.
Low reach turns physical work into shelter. High reach turns it into the main exposure.
placeholder Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index O*NET 31.0 Anthropic Economic Index Pin one release data 0.1-placeholder
What changes
Tasks moving to machines, in whole or in part.
- Volume copy: product descriptions, variants, summaries, SEO pages.
- First drafts against a brief.
- Rewriting the same idea for six different channels.
What stays human
Tasks that need a person, and why.
- Having the idea nobody asked for.
- Knowing what an organisation must never say.
- Being accountable for a sentence that reaches a million people.
What's new
Work that did not exist in this job ten years ago.
- Editing and fact-checking machine drafts at volumes no team used to write.
- Setting and policing a voice that anyone in the company can now generate against.
- Work that exists because everything is cheap to produce and almost nothing is distinctive.
These three lists are editorial commentary, written against task-level data but not generated from it (OCC-05). Treat them as the author's reading, not as output.
Compare with another job
Pick one. You get a card with both scores, both sets of components, and a link worth sending to someone.
- Hairdresser 84
- Plumber 82
- Primary school teacher 79
- Electrician 79
- Aged care worker 75
- General practitioner 73
- Registered nurse 72
- Chef 69
- Fashion designer 65
- Civil engineer 59
- Product designer 55
- Software developer 44
- Graphic designer 43
- Heavy truck driver 34
- Data analyst 32
- Paralegal 31
- Accountant 28
- Bank teller 13
- Customer service representative 12
Sources used on this page
- Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs
International Labour Organization · 2025 index · Confirm
- O*NET
US Department of Labor · 31.0 · CC BY 4.0
- Anthropic Economic Index
Anthropic · Pin one release · Confirm
published by an AI company