A closer look
Heavy truck driver
AI can plan the route. Driving it is a robot question, not a chatbot one.
Driving, loading and strapping down the load are all well out of AI software's reach. Planning the route is the one task it could take a fair chunk of. Self-driving trucks are a robot question, and this score doesn't measure robots.
76 / 100
Mostly holds up against AI
AI can take a few chores off your plate, but most of the day is still yours.
Not the odds you keep your job. It's how much of the everyday work still needs a person, out of 100.
The ILO's official verdict: Minimal Exposure
4 of the 20 jobs up close
Not quite your week? Make it yours ↓
Why this score?
The ILO rated each task in this job for how much of it AI could do. They average 24.5 out of 100, so the job holds up at 100 − 24.5 = 75.5.
ILO group “Minimal Exposure”: A few tasks are affected, but the heart of the job isn't.
- AI helps JSA 2025
- 56
- Usually good news: more of the work gets quicker without the job going away.
- AI takes over JSA 2025
- 21
- This is what most people mean by “exposed”. We keep it apart from helping on purpose.
- Hands-on O*NET 31.0
- 63.6
- Software can't do hands-on work, but robots might one day. How far they've got isn't on this site, because nobody measures it well enough yet.
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index O*NET 31.0 Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.8-observed-use
Man v Bot · compare
Who holds up better?
Heavy truck driver 76
vGo on, try your partner's job. Or your sibling's. We won't tell.
Man v Bot
Where the bot helps, and where the human wins
Bot
What AI takes
The routine stuff. You may not miss it.
- Route planning, load optimisation and compliance logging.
- Long, uniform highway stretches.
- Yard movements and depot shunting.
Man
What people still do better
Judgement, trust and skilled hands. Hard to download.
- The first and last mile, where nothing is standardised.
- Securing, checking and taking responsibility for a load.
- Everything that happens when the plan fails.
Both
What's arriving
New work that only exists because the AI does.
- Supervising convoys and remotely operated vehicles.
- Transfer-hub roles created by automated trunk routes.
- Exception handling as a specialism.
Written by a human, from the task data. Yes, we see the irony. Read it as one person's take.
Meet your two rivals
They're not the same machine. AI software can only reach the parts of a job done on a screen or in words. A chatbot can't climb a ladder. A robot might, one day, if it doesn't fall off.
The AI
Lives in a screen. Never had to fix a boiler.
Threat level: Low
21 could do without you
It could take over very little of the work on its own. It could help with 56 of 100.
The robot
The wildcard. Has hands, still working out stairs.
How much it matters here: Higher
64 how hands-on
Most of this job needs hands, a body or turning up. That's robot territory, and nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to give you a number. We won't make one up.
So could a robot do the physical part?
Less fine handwork and fewer cramped spaces than a typical hands-on job. That clears one hurdle for machines. It doesn't mean machines are doing this work yet.
Robots hate fiddly work in awkward spaces. On that measure, this job scores 39 out of 100. The higher it is, the longer the robot waits.
This one's a borderline call, so a future update could tip it the other way. Hold it loosely.
and cramped
Kind of hands-on work Hands-on, less fiddly work
The small print
It isn't a robot score, and nothing on this page is. Nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to put a number on it. This is the closest thing we have: how much fiddly handwork and cramped, awkward work the job takes, which is what Frey and Osborne found hardest for machines.
The numbers come straight from the US job database's entry for Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers. Its wider group, Heavy truck and lorry drivers, lands in the same place.
finger skill 39.3 · hand skill 42.9 · cramped spaces 35.8 · hands-on 63.6 · caring 2.19 of 7 · rule: hands-on 50+ · fiddly under 39.4
from the source O*NET 31.0 data 0.8-observed-use measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
New · the weekly task audit
Your week, your score
The score above assumes truck drivers spend the same time on every task. You don't. Slide each task to how much of your week it takes, and we'll re-weight the same ILO ratings to fit your job.
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
Your score
76 / 100
Same as the job as a whole, so far.
Move the sliders to make it yours.
The job as a whole: 76 / 100
Link copied.
Nothing you enter leaves your browser. The link just carries your slider positions.
Meanwhile, in real life…
Everything else here is about what AI could do. This is what people actually did. When they asked Claude for help with this kind of work, did they hand the whole task over, or roll their sleeves up and work through it together?
Tiny sample alert This job makes up under 0.01% of all the conversations: a tiny slice, mostly the paperwork rather than the work. People using AI for a job isn't the same as AI being able to do it.
Out of every 100 conversations
worked through it together handed it over
The small print
Anthropic publishes this about its own product, and it doesn't feed into any score here. These are people who use Claude, not workers in general, so little use here doesn't mean AI can't reach the job.
These two add up to 100. The bars elsewhere on the page don't, because each is scored on its own, so we don't put them side by side.
observed use Anthropic Economic Index release 2026-06-26, period beginning 2026-05-01 data 0.8-observed-use 2026-05-01 · Anthropic, about its own product
So, should truck drivers be worried?
Short answer: not much. Some of the chores will change, and good riddance.
Not about AI tools, which can take the route planning and the logbook and little else. The real question is self-driving trucks, which this score doesn't measure. Even there, the first and last mile, and everything that happens when the plan fails, are the hardest parts to automate.
Worth remembering: we score tasks, not jobs. When AI takes on a task, the job usually reshuffles around it rather than vanishing. Bank tellers survived the cash machine. The job just got more chatty.
Where this job could lead
None of the new jobs we've written up start from here yet. Could be you're the first. See the jobs AI is creating →
Fancy a rematch?
Put truck drivers up against another job, then send the result to someone who needs a little humbling.
- Plumber 85
- Hairdresser 83
- Electrician 81
- Aged care worker 75
- Chef 75
- Registered nurse 75
- Primary school teacher 74
- General practitioner 71
- Civil engineer 70
- Fashion designer 65
- Paralegal 61
- Data analyst 51
- Product designer 51
- Graphic designer 51
- Accountant 49
- Software developer 47
- Copywriter 46
- Customer service representative 42
- Bank teller 42
Where this page's numbers come from
- Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs
International Labour Organization · 2025 index · CC BY 4.0
- O*NET
US Department of Labor · 31.0 · CC BY 4.0
- Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study)
Jobs and Skills Australia · September 2025 detailed data release · CC BY 4.0