Skip to content
man bot
Compare

Technicians and associate professionals · code 3314

Statistical, mathematical and related associate professionals

AI can make the charts and do the calculations. This one is changing fast.

AI could take a fair chunk of seven of the eight tasks, led by preparing statistical results and keeping registers and samples. Only supervising the statistical clerks is mostly out of its reach.

What they actually do (and what else they get called)

Statistical, mathematical and related associate professionals assist in planning the collection, processing and presentation of statistical, mathematical or actuarial data and in carrying out these operations, usually working under the guidance of statisticians, mathematicians and actuaries. Tasks include - (a) assisting in planning and performing statistical, mathematical, actuarial, and related calculations; (b) preparing detailed estimates of quantities and costs of materials and labour required for statistical census and survey operations; (c) performing technical tasks connected with establishing, maintaining and using registers and sampling frames for census and survey operations; (d) performing technical tasks connected with data collection and quality control operations in censuses and surveys; (e) using standard computer software packages to perform mathematical, actuarial, statistical, accounting and related calculations; (f) preparing statistical, mathematical, actuarial, accounting and other results for presentation in graphical or tabular form; (g) applying knowledge of statistical, mathematical, actuarial, accounting and related principles and practices in order to identify and solve problems arising in the course of their work; (h) supervising the work of statistical clerks. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Actuarial assistant - Mathematical assistant - Statistical assistant Some related occupations classified elsewhere: - Actuary - 2120 - Mathematician - 2120 - Statistician - 2120 - Accounting assistant - 3313 - Statistical clerk - 4312

  • actuarial assistant
  • statistical assistant

Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.

43 / 100

Changing significantly

AI could do a real share of the everyday tasks. The job is changing shape, not vanishing.

Not the odds you keep your job. It's how much of the everyday work still needs a person, out of 100.

← Robot's turf Human's turf →

The ILO's official verdict: Exposed: Gradient 3

404 of 427 for holding up against AI

Why this score?

The ILO rated each of this job's 8 tasks for how much of it AI could do. They average 56.6 out of 100, so it holds up at 100 − 56.6 = 43.4.

That's the whole sum. No black box, no secret sauce: you can check it against the ILO's study. ILO group “Exposed: Gradient 3”: Most of the tasks are affected.

This job rates 8.5 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Man v Bot · compare

Who holds up better?

Statistical, mathematical and related associate professionals 43

v

Go on, try your partner's job. Or your sibling's. We won't tell.

Man v Bot

Where the bot helps, and where the human wins

Bot

What AI takes

The routine stuff. You may not miss it.

  • Charts and tables.
  • Calculations.
  • Data collection and quality checks.

Man

What people still do better

Judgement, trust and skilled hands. Hard to download.

  • Spotting problems in data.
  • Supervision.
  • Checking results.

Both

What's arriving

New work that only exists because the AI does.

  • Checking AI analysis.
  • Data engineering roles.
  • Administrative data replacing surveys.

Written by a human, from the ILO's task ratings below. Yes, we see the irony. Read it as one person's take.

Meet your two rivals

They're not the same machine. AI software can only reach the parts of a job done on a screen or in words. A chatbot can't climb a ladder. A robot might, one day, if it doesn't fall off.

The AI

Lives in a screen. Never had to fix a boiler.

Threat level: High

68 could do without you

It could take over a lot of this job on its own. It could help with 74 of 100.

The robot

The wildcard. Has hands, still working out stairs.

How much it matters here: Lower

9 how hands-on

Not much of this job needs hands, so the robot can sit this one out.

So could a robot do the physical part?

Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.

Robots hate fiddly work in awkward spaces. On that measure, this job scores 14 out of 100. The higher it is, the longer the robot waits.

9 How
hands-on
14 How fiddly
and cramped

Kind of hands-on work Less than half hands-on

The small print

They aren't a robot score, and nothing on this page is. Nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to put a number on it. These are the closest thing we have: how hands-on the job is, and how much fiddly, cramped work it takes, which is what Frey and Osborne found hardest for machines.

From O*NET, averaged across 6 US jobs .

finger skill 28.2 · hand skill 5.1 · cramped spaces 9.1 · averaged · rule: hands-on under 50

estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.8-observed-use measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement

The job, task by task

Every job is really a bundle of tasks. Here's this one unpacked, with how much of each AI could do, out of 100. The score is the average, and averages can hide a lot.

AI's favourite task here scores 68, against an average of 57. The bigger the gap, the more lopsided the job: some of it wide open to AI, some of it barely touched.

  1. 68

    Preparing statistical, mathematical, actuarial, accounting and other results for presentation in graphical or tabular form

    Medium
  2. 67

    Performing technical tasks connected with establishing, maintaining and using registers and sampling frames for census and survey operations

    Medium
  3. 62

    Applying knowledge of statistical, mathematical, actuarial, accounting and related principles and practices in order to identify and solve problems arising in the course of their work

    Medium
  4. 59

    Assisting in planning and performing statistical, mathematical, actuarial and related calculations

    Medium
  5. 55

    Using standard computer software packages to perform mathematical, actuarial, statistical, accounting and related calculations

    Medium
  6. 53

    Performing technical tasks connected with data collection and quality control operations in censuses and surveys

    Medium
  7. 53

    Preparing detailed estimates of quantities and costs of materials and labour required for statistical census and survey operations

    Medium
  8. 37

    Supervising the work of statistical clerks.

    Low

8 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Sidekick or replacement?

A tool that makes you faster is a very different thing from one that does the task while you watch. Jobs and Skills Australia measured the two separately, which is handy.

AI helps you
74
AI does it for you
68

Sidekick wins, by 6 points.

How good a match is this?

One Australian job matches this one closely, so this is about as reliable as it gets here.

estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.8-observed-use matched to Australian jobs 5523

Meanwhile, in real life…

Everything else here is about what AI could do. This is what people actually did. When they asked Claude for help with this kind of work, did they hand the whole task over, or roll their sleeves up and work through it together?

Out of every 100 conversations

45
55

worked through it together handed it over

The small print

Anthropic publishes this about its own product, and it doesn't feed into any score here. These are people who use Claude, not workers in general, so little use here doesn't mean AI can't reach the job. This job makes up 2.3% of the conversations.

The data is sorted by US job, and this one matches 6 of them. We've combined them, counting each by how often it comes up in the conversations, so the busiest one counts most.

These two add up to 100. The bars elsewhere on the page don't, because each is scored on its own, so we don't put them side by side.

observed use Anthropic Economic Index release 2026-06-26, period beginning 2026-05-01 data 0.8-observed-use 2026-05-01 · Anthropic, about its own product

So, should statistical assistants be worried?

Short answer: not worried, but paying attention. The job is changing.

Yes, much of this job is exposed. Charts and tables, registers, calculations, software, data collection and estimates are rated Medium; supervision is Low. AI does much of this work, so remaining roles focus on quality and checking.

Worth remembering: we score tasks, not jobs. When AI takes on a task, the job usually reshuffles around it rather than vanishing.

Where this job could lead

None of the new jobs we've written up start from here yet. Could be you're the first. See the jobs AI is creating →

How are the neighbours doing?

There are 82 jobs in the “Technicians and associate professionals” family, averaging 66. This one is below the family average.

Pit this against any other job →