Service and sales workers · code 5112
Transport conductors
Transport conductors check and issue tickets and ensure the safety and comfort of passengers on trains, trams, buses and other public transport vehicles. Tasks include - (a) collecting and issuing tickets, passes or fares, and checking the validity of tickets issued previously; (b) attending to sleeping-cars and their occupants on passenger trains; (c) providing assistance with boarding, seating and luggage as required, especially to elderly, sick or injured people; (d) opening and closing doors for passengers; (e) performing equipment safety checks prior to departure; (f) signalling to drivers to stop or proceed; (g) greeting passengers boarding transportation equipment, and announcing routes and stops. (h) ensuring that safety regulations are respected; (i) responding to passengers’ requests and complaints and providing information about stops and connections; (j) taking appropriate action in case of emergencies or accidents. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Bus conductor - Cable car conductor - Ticket inspector (public transport) - Train conductor - Tram conductor
A few tasks are affected, but the heart of the job isn't. It ranks 197 of 427 for holding up against AI.
Also known as
- chief conductor
- railway passenger service agent
- train conductor
Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.
against AI Minimal Exposure
AI could take on 24.9 of 100, on average
so it holds up at 100 − 24.9 = 75.1
That's the whole sum, and you can check it against the ILO's study.
out of 100
From O*NET, averaged across 3 US jobs
and cramped
finger skill 30.4 · hand skill 30.8 · cramped spaces 21.8 · averaged
Kind of hands-on work · hands-on 50+ · fiddly under 39.4 Hands-on, less fiddly work
Less fine handwork and fewer cramped spaces than a typical hands-on job. That clears one hurdle for machines. It doesn't mean machines are doing this work yet.
estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.7-work-setting measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
This number is probably too high
This score only looks at AI tools like chatbots. It doesn't look at robots at all — and this job rates 57 out of 100 for how hands-on it is, which is exactly where robots come in.
Have a look at the tasks below and judge for yourself. The ILO scored them low because a chatbot can't do them. Whether a machine with hands could is a different question, and we can't answer it yet.
The tasks behind the score
The score is the average of these. A job is really a bundle of tasks, and an average can hide how uneven that bundle is.
The task AI could do most of scores 61.5, while the average is 24.9. A big gap means some of this job is wide open to AI and some of it barely at all. That's quite different from a job where everything sits somewhere in the middle, even when the averages match.
- 61.5
Responding to passengers requests and complaints and providing information about stops and connections
Medium - 46.3
Collecting and issuing tickets, passes or fares, and checking the validity of tickets issued previously
Low - 29
Greeting passengers boarding transportation equipment, and announcing routes and stops.
Low - 23
Ensuring that safety regulations are respected
Very Low - 20
Performing equipment safety checks prior to departure
Very Low - 17.5
Attending to sleeping-cars and their occupants on passenger trains
Very Low - 17.5
Signalling to drivers to stop or proceed
Very Low - 13.5
Providing assistance with boarding, seating and luggage as required, especially to elderly, sick, or injured people
Very Low - 11.8
Taking appropriate action in case of emergencies or accidents.
Very Low - 9.3
Opening and closing doors for passengers
Very Low
10 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.7-work-setting
Helped, or replaced?
The score above can't tell a tool that makes you faster from one that does the task instead of you. Jobs and Skills Australia looked at those two things separately, and this is their result, matched to this job.
One Australian job matches this one closely, so this is about as reliable as it gets here.
- AI helps you
- 52
- AI does it for you
- 49
Helping wins by 3 points.
estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.7-work-setting matched to Australian jobs 6394
Compared with similar jobs
There are 39 jobs in the “Service and sales workers” group, averaging 74.4. This one is above that.
- Prison guards 86.2
- Police officers 86.1
- Pet groomers and animal care workers 85.9
- Health care assistants 85.9
- Personal care workers in health servi… 85
- Undertakers and embalmers 83.3
- Hairdressers 82.7
- Beauticians and related workers 81.7
- Fire-fighters 81.7
- Cooks 81.6
- Child care workers 80.9
- Protective services workers not elsew… 80.3
- Domestic housekeepers 80.1
- Security guards 79.8
- Driving instructors 79.5
- Personal services workers not elsewhe… 78.7
- Travel attendants and travel stewards 78.5
- Companions and valets 78.2
- Cleaning and housekeeping supervisors… 78
- Street food salespersons 77.5
- Food service counter attendants 76.2
- Service station attendants 75.9
- Teachers' aides 75.9
- Home-based personal care workers 75.3
- Fashion and other models 75.2
- Bartenders 73.9
- Building caretakers 73.4
- Waiters 71.9