Elementary occupations · code 9622
Odd job persons
AI can tell you how to fix the door. It won't come round and fix it.
AI barely touches any of the seven tasks, from changing light bulbs and tap washers to adjusting doors and fitting handrails.
What they actually do (and what else they get called)
Odd-job persons clean, paint and maintain buildings, grounds and facilities, and undertake simple repairs. Tasks include - (a) repairing broken windows, screens, doors, fences, barbecues, picnic tables, shelves, cupboards and other items; (b) replacing defective items such as light bulbs; (c) repairing and painting interior and exterior surfaces such as walls, ceilings and fences; (d) adjusting doors and windows; (e) replacing tap washers; (f) putting up handrails and grab rails; (g) unloading coal or wood and putting it into cellars of private households or establishments. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Handyperson - Hotel useful - Odd-job person
- handyman
Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.
89 / 100
Strongly holds up against AI
Most of this job still needs an actual human. AI would mostly be making the tea.
Not the odds you keep your job. It's how much of the everyday work still needs a person, out of 100.
The ILO's official verdict: Not Exposed
19 of 427 for holding up against AI
Not quite your week? Make it yours ↓
Why this score?
The ILO rated each of this job's 7 tasks for how much of it AI could do. They average 11 out of 100, so it holds up at 100 − 11 = 89.
That's the whole sum. No black box, no secret sauce: you can check it against the ILO's study. ILO group “Not Exposed”: None of this job's tasks scored high enough to count.
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use
Pinch of salt: this number is probably too rosy
It only asks what AI software could do, and this job is 74 out of 100 hands-on. A chatbot can't do that part. A robot might, one day, and nobody measures how close that is.
Man v Bot · compare
Who holds up better?
Odd job persons 89
vGo on, try your partner's job. Or your sibling's. We won't tell.
Man v Bot
Where the bot helps, and where the human wins
Bot
What AI takes
The routine stuff. You may not miss it.
- Finding jobs and taking bookings through apps.
- Quotes, invoices and payments.
- Looking up how to fix something unfamiliar.
Man
What people still do better
Judgement, trust and skilled hands. Hard to download.
- Turning up and fixing a hundred different small problems.
- Being trusted in someone's home.
- Improvising with whatever is there.
Both
What's arriving
New work that only exists because the AI does.
- Installing smart home devices for customers.
- Home adaptations for older people.
- Work found and rated through online platforms.
Written by a human, from the ILO's task ratings below. Yes, we see the irony. Read it as one person's take.
Meet your two rivals
They're not the same machine. AI software can only reach the parts of a job done on a screen or in words. A chatbot can't climb a ladder. A robot might, one day, if it doesn't fall off.
The AI
Lives in a screen. Never had to fix a boiler.
Threat level: Low
10 could do without you
It could take over very little of the work on its own. It could help with 43 of 100.
The robot
The wildcard. Has hands, still working out stairs.
How much it matters here: Higher
74 how hands-on
Most of this job needs hands, a body or turning up. That's robot territory, and nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to give you a number. We won't make one up.
So could a robot do the physical part?
More fine handwork, and more time in cramped or awkward spots, than a typical hands-on job. That is exactly what machines find hardest: they do best in tidy, predictable places.
Robots hate fiddly work in awkward spaces. On that measure, this job scores 47 out of 100. The higher it is, the longer the robot waits.
hands-on
and cramped
Kind of hands-on work Hands-on, fiddly work in tight spaces
The small print
They aren't a robot score, and nothing on this page is. Nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to put a number on it. These are the closest thing we have: how hands-on the job is, and how much fiddly, cramped work it takes, which is what Frey and Osborne found hardest for machines.
From O*NET, averaged across 3 US jobs .
finger skill 45.8 · hand skill 45.8 · cramped spaces 48.7 · averaged · rule: hands-on 50+ · fiddly 39.4+
estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.8-observed-use measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
The job, task by task
Every job is really a bundle of tasks. Here's this one unpacked, with how much of each AI could do, out of 100. The score is the average, and averages can hide a lot.
AI's favourite task here scores 15, against an average of 11. The bigger the gap, the more lopsided the job: some of it wide open to AI, some of it barely touched.
- 15
Adjusting doors and windows
Very Low - 14
Replacing defective items such as light bulbs
Very Low - 12
Repairing and painting interior and exterior surfaces such as walls, ceilings and fences
Very Low - 10
Repairing broken windows, screens, doors, fences, barbecues, picnic tables, shelves, cupboards and other items
Very Low - 10
Unloading coal or wood and putting it into cellars of private households or establishments.
Very Low - 8
Replacing tap washers
Very Low - 8
Putting up handrails and grab rails
Very Low
7 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use
New · the weekly task audit
Your week, your score
The score above assumes handymen and odd job workers spend the same time on every task. You don't. Slide each task to how much of your week it takes, and we'll re-weight the same ILO ratings to fit your job.
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
- Some
Your score
89 / 100
Same as the job as a whole, so far.
Move the sliders to make it yours.
The job as a whole: 89 / 100
Link copied.
Nothing you enter leaves your browser. The link just carries your slider positions.
Sidekick or replacement?
A tool that makes you faster is a very different thing from one that does the task while you watch. Jobs and Skills Australia measured the two separately, which is handy.
- AI helps you
- 43
- AI does it for you
- 10
Sidekick wins, by 33 points.
How good a match is this?
One Australian job matches this one closely, so this is about as reliable as it gets here.
estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.8-observed-use matched to Australian jobs 8993
Meanwhile, in real life…
Everything else here is about what AI could do. This is what people actually did. When they asked Claude for help with this kind of work, did they hand the whole task over, or roll their sleeves up and work through it together?
Out of every 100 conversations
worked through it together handed it over
The small print
Anthropic publishes this about its own product, and it doesn't feed into any score here. These are people who use Claude, not workers in general, so little use here doesn't mean AI can't reach the job. This job makes up 0.21% of the conversations.
These two add up to 100. The bars elsewhere on the page don't, because each is scored on its own, so we don't put them side by side.
observed use Anthropic Economic Index release 2026-06-26, period beginning 2026-05-01 data 0.8-observed-use 2026-05-01 · Anthropic, about its own product
So, should handymen and odd job workers be worried?
Short answer: not really. Put the kettle on.
No. Adjusting doors, replacing bulbs, painting and repairs all rate Very Low. People now look up fixes online, but most would still rather someone came round, and booking apps make that work easier to find.
Worth remembering: we score tasks, not jobs. When AI takes on a task, the job usually reshuffles around it rather than vanishing.
Where this job could lead
None of the new jobs we've written up start from here yet. Could be you're the first. See the jobs AI is creating →
How are the neighbours doing?
There are 33 jobs in the “Elementary occupations” family, averaging 85. This one is above the family average.
- Vehicle cleaners 91
- Water and firewood collectors 91
- Crop farm labourers 91
- Garbage and recycling collectors 91
- Civil engineering labourers 91
- Forestry labourers 91
- Building construction labourers 91
- Sweepers and related labourers 91
- Other cleaning workers 90
- Mining and quarrying labourers 89
- Window cleaners 89
- Fishery and aquaculture labourers 89
- Mixed crop and livestock farm laboure… 89
- Garden and horticultural labourers 88
- Cleaners and helpers in offices, hote… 88
- Livestock farm labourers 88
- Manufacturing labourers not elsewhere… 88
- Kitchen helpers 87
- Drivers of animal-drawn vehicles and … 87
- Freight handlers 86
- Domestic cleaners and helpers 86
- Hand launderers and pressers 86
- Street and related service workers 82
- Refuse sorters 82
- Fast food preparers 82
- Hand packers 80
- Shelf fillers 80
- Street vendors (excluding food) 80