Professionals · code 2149
Engineering professionals not elsewhere classified
This unit group covers engineering professionals not classified elsewhere in Minor Group 214: Engineering Professionals (excluding Electrotechnology) or in Minor Group 215: Electrotechnology Engineers. For instance, the group includes those who conduct research, advise on or develop engineering procedures and solutions concerning workplace safety, biomedical engineering, optics, materials, nuclear power generation and explosives. In such cases tasks would include - (a) applying knowledge of engineering to the design, development and evaluation of biological and health systems and products such as artificial organs, prostheses, and instrumentation; (b) designing devices used in various medical procedures and imaging systems such as magnetic resonance imaging, and devices for automating insulin injections or controlling body functions; (c) designing components of optical instruments such as lenses, microscopes, telescopes, lasers, optical disc systems and other equipment that utilize the properties of light; (d) designing, testing, and coordinating the development of explosive ordnance material to meet military procurement specifications; (e) designing and overseeing the construction and operation of nuclear reactors and power plants and nuclear fuels reprocessing and reclamation systems; (f) designing and developing nuclear equipment such as reactor cores, radiation shielding and associated instrumentation and control mechanisms; (g) assessing damage and providing calculations for marine salvage operations; (h) studying and advising on engineering aspects of particular manufacturing processes, such as those related to glass, ceramics, textiles, leather products, wood and printing; (i) identifying potential hazards and introducing safety procedures and devices. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Biomedical engineer - Explosive ordnance engineer - Marine salvage engineer - Materials engineer - Nuclear power generation engineer - Optical engineer - Quantity surveyor - Safety engineer - Time and motion study engineer Some related occupations classified elsewhere: - Industrial and production engineers - 2141 - Environmental engineers - 2143 - Surveyor - 2165 Notes: It should be noted that, while they are appropriately classified in this unit group with other engineering professionals, biomedical engineers are considered to be an integral part of the health workforce alongside those occupations classified in Sub-major Group 22: Health Professionals, and others classified in a number of other unit groups in Major Group 2: Professionals.
None of this job's tasks scored high enough to count. It ranks 244 of 427 for holding up against AI.
Also known as
- energy engineer
- materials engineer
- quantity surveyor
- acoustical engineer
- robotics engineer
- dismantling engineer
- commissioning engineer
- textile, leather and footwear researcher
- optical engineer
- patent engineer
- bioengineer
- health and safety engineer
- application engineer
- test engineer
- aviation ground systems engineer
Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.
against AI Not Exposed
AI could take on 30.5 of 100, on average
so it holds up at 100 − 30.5 = 69.5
That's the whole sum, and you can check it against the ILO's study.
out of 100
From O*NET, averaged across 13 US jobs , so treat it as rough
and cramped
finger skill 23.9 · hand skill 17.4 · cramped spaces 18.2 · averaged
Kind of hands-on work · hands-on under 50 Less than half hands-on
Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.
estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.7-work-setting measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
What this number leaves out This job rates 29.8 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.
The tasks behind the score
The score is the average of these. A job is really a bundle of tasks, and an average can hide how uneven that bundle is.
The task AI could do most of scores 38.5, while the average is 30.5. A big gap means some of this job is wide open to AI and some of it barely at all. That's quite different from a job where everything sits somewhere in the middle, even when the averages match.
- 38.5
Designing components of optical instruments such as lenses, microscopes, telescopes, lasers, optical disc systems and other equipment that utilize the properties of light
Low - 37.5
Applying knowledge of engineering to the design, development and evaluation of biological and health systems and products such as artificial organs, prostheses and instrumentation
Low - 37
Studying and advising on engineering aspects of particular manufacturing processes, such as those related to glass, ceramics, textiles, leather products, wood and printing
Low - 34.5
Designing and overseeing construction and operation of nuclear reactors and power plants and nuclear fuels reprocessing and reclamation systems
Low - 31.5
Designing and developing nuclear equipment such as reactor cores, radiation shielding and associated instrumentation and control mechanisms
Low - 30.8
Designing devices used in various medical procedures and imaging systems such as magnetic resonance imaging, and devices for automating insulin injections or controlling body functions
Low - 26.5
Identifying potential hazards and introducing safety procedures and devices.
Low - 25
Assessing damage and providing calculations for marine salvage operations
Low - 13
Designing, testing, and coordinating the development of explosive ordnance material to meet military procurement specifications
Very Low
9 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.7-work-setting
Helped, or replaced?
The score above can't tell a tool that makes you faster from one that does the task instead of you. Jobs and Skills Australia looked at those two things separately, and this is their result, matched to this job.
5 Australian jobs match this one, and we've simply averaged them. Treat the numbers as a rough guide.
- AI helps you
- 71.8
- AI does it for you
- 34.4
Helping wins by 37.4 points.
estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.7-work-setting matched to Australian jobs 2331, 2332, 2335, 2339, 3126
Compared with similar jobs
There are 92 jobs in the “Professionals” group, averaging 61.2. This one is above that.
- Creative and performing artists not e… 87.1
- Veterinarians 85.8
- Dentists 85.1
- Religious professionals 83.4
- Dancers and choreographers 80.6
- Health professionals not elsewhere cl… 80.5
- Early childhood educators 79.2
- Visual artists 79
- Paramedical practitioners 76.7
- Optometrists and ophthalmic opticians 76.3
- Audiologists and speech therapists 76.2
- Nursing professionals 74.8
- Primary school teachers 73.9
- Specialist medical practitioners 72.9
- Environmental and occupational health… 72
- Musicians, singers and composers 72
- Social work and counselling professio… 71.7
- Physiotherapists 71.6
- Special needs teachers 71.6
- Farming, forestry and fisheries advis… 71.5
- Generalist medical practitioners 71.3
- Mining engineers, metallurgists and r… 70.7
- Secondary education teachers 70.2
- Midwifery professionals 70.1
- Civil engineers 69.8
- Judges 68.7
- Electrical engineers 68.6
- Actors 68.6