Professionals · code 2266
Audiologists and speech therapists
Audiologists and speech therapists evaluate, manage and treat physical disorders affecting human hearing, speech, communication and swallowing. They prescribe corrective devices or rehabilitative therapies for hearing loss, speech disorders and related sensory and neural problems, and provide counselling on hearing safety and communication performance. Tasks include - (a) evaluating hearing, speech and language performance in patients to determine the nature of hearing and communication disorders; (b) administering hearing or speech/language tests or other examinations using specialized diagnostic instruments and equipment, and interpreting test results alongside other medical, social and behavioural diagnostic data to determine appropriate courses of treatment; (c) planning, directing and participating in counselling, screening, speech rehabilitation and other programmes related to hearing and communication; (d) prescribing hearing aids and other assistive devices according to patients’ needs and instructing them in their use; (e) planning and conducting treatment programmes to manage physical disorders affecting speech and swallowing; (f) counselling and guiding hearing and/or language-impaired individuals, their families, teachers and employers; (g) referring patients and families to additional medical or educational services if needed. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Audiologist - Language therapist - Speech pathologist - Speech therapist
None of this job's tasks scored high enough to count. It ranks 184 of 427 for holding up against AI.
Also known as
- audiologist
- speech and language therapist
Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.
against AI Not Exposed
AI could take on 23.8 of 100, on average
so it holds up at 100 − 23.8 = 76.2
That's the whole sum, and you can check it against the ILO's study.
out of 100
From O*NET, averaged across 2 US jobs
and cramped
finger skill 41.2 · hand skill 25 · cramped spaces 11.4 · averaged
Kind of hands-on work · hands-on under 50 Less than half hands-on
Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.
estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.7-work-setting measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
What this number leaves out This job rates 30.4 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.
The tasks behind the score
The score is the average of these. A job is really a bundle of tasks, and an average can hide how uneven that bundle is.
The task AI could do most of scores 28, while the average is 23.8. A big gap means some of this job is wide open to AI and some of it barely at all. That's quite different from a job where everything sits somewhere in the middle, even when the averages match.
- 28
Administering hearing or speech/language tests or other examinations using specialized diagnostic instruments and equipment, and interpreting test results alongside other medical, social and behavioural diagnostic data to determine appropriate courses of treatment
Low - 27
Referring patients and families to additional medical or educational services if needed.
Low - 25.3
Counselling and guiding hearing and/or language-impaired individuals, their families, teachers and employers
Low - 23.5
Evaluating hearing, speech and language performance in patients to determine the nature of hearing and communication disorders
Very Low - 23.5
Planning, directing and participating in counselling, screening, speech rehabilitation and other programmes related to hearing and communication
Very Low - 22.1
Planning and conducting treatment programmes to manage physical disorders affecting speech and swallowing
Very Low - 17
Prescribing hearing aids and other assistive devices according to patients’ needs and instructing them in their use
Very Low
7 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.7-work-setting
Helped, or replaced?
The score above can't tell a tool that makes you faster from one that does the task instead of you. Jobs and Skills Australia looked at those two things separately, and this is their result, matched to this job.
One Australian job matches, but only partly: not everyone in it does this job. Treat the numbers as a rough guide.
- AI helps you
- 69
- AI does it for you
- 30
Helping wins by 39 points.
estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.7-work-setting matched to Australian jobs 2527
Compared with similar jobs
There are 92 jobs in the “Professionals” group, averaging 61.2. This one is above that.
- Creative and performing artists not e… 87.1
- Veterinarians 85.8
- Dentists 85.1
- Religious professionals 83.4
- Dancers and choreographers 80.6
- Health professionals not elsewhere cl… 80.5
- Early childhood educators 79.2
- Visual artists 79
- Paramedical practitioners 76.7
- Optometrists and ophthalmic opticians 76.3
- Nursing professionals 74.8
- Primary school teachers 73.9
- Specialist medical practitioners 72.9
- Environmental and occupational health… 72
- Musicians, singers and composers 72
- Social work and counselling professio… 71.7
- Physiotherapists 71.6
- Special needs teachers 71.6
- Farming, forestry and fisheries advis… 71.5
- Generalist medical practitioners 71.3
- Mining engineers, metallurgists and r… 70.7
- Secondary education teachers 70.2
- Midwifery professionals 70.1
- Civil engineers 69.8
- Engineering professionals not elsewhe… 69.5
- Judges 68.7
- Electrical engineers 68.6
- Actors 68.6