Skip to content
man bot
Compare

Professionals · code 2212

Specialist medical practitioners

AI can read the research and draft the letter. It can't operate, or break bad news gently.

AI barely touches five of the twelve tasks, including surgery and handling complications in childbirth. Research and advising patients on staying well are mostly out of its reach too.

What they actually do (and what else they get called)

Specialist medical practitioners (medical doctors) diagnose, treat and prevent illness, disease, injury and other physical and mental impairments in humans, using specialized testing, diagnostic, medical, surgical, physical and psychiatric techniques through application of the principles and procedures of modern medicine. They specialize in certain disease categories, types of patient or methods of treatment and may conduct medical education and research in their chosen areas of specialization. Tasks include - (a) conducting physical examinations of patients and interviewing them and their families to determine their health status; (b) considering medical information provided by a referring doctor or other health care provider, (c) ordering specialized diagnostic tests to determine the nature of disorders or illnesses; (d) prescribing, administering and monitoring patients’ responses to treatments, medications, anaesthetics, psychotherapies, physical rehabilitation programmes and other preventive and curative measures; (e) performing surgery of a general or specialized nature; (f) managing complications before, during and after childbirth; (g) recording patients’ medical information and exchanging information with other health professionals to ensure the provision of comprehensive care; (h) reporting births, deaths and notifiable diseases to government authorities to meet legal and professional requirements; (i) providing information to patients and families and communities about preventive measures, treatment and care for specific ailments; (j) performing autopsies to determine cause of death; (k) conducting research into specific human disorders and illnesses and preventive or curative methods and disseminating the findings such as through scientific reports; (l) planning and participating in programmes designed to prevent the occurrence and spread of specific diseases. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Anaesthetist - Cardiologist - Emergency medicine specialist - Gynaecologist - Obstetrician - Ophthalmologist - Paediatrician - Pathologist - Preventive medicine specialist - Psychiatrist - Radiation oncologist - Radiologist - Resident medical officer in specialist training - Specialist medical practitioner (public health) - Specialist physician (internal medicine) - Specialist physician (nuclear medicine) - Surgeon Some related occupations classified elsewhere: - Biomedical researcher - 2131 - General practitioner - 2211 - Resident medical officer specializing in general practice - 2211 - Dental practitioner - 2261 - Dental surgeon - 2261 - Oral and maxillofacial surgeon - 2261 - Clinical psychologist - 2634 Notes Occupations included in this unit group require completion of a university-level degree in basic medical education plus postgraduate clinical training in a medical specialization (except general practice) or equivalent. Resident medical officers and interns training as specialist practitioners (except general practice) are included here. Although in some countries 'stomatology' may be considered as a medical specialization, stomatologists should be included in Unit group -2261, Dentists. Medical research professionals who participate in biomedical research using living organisms and do not undertake clinical practice are classified in Unit Group 2131: Biologists, Botanists, Zoologists and Related Professionals.

  • specialised doctor

Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.

73 / 100

Mostly holds up against AI

AI can take a few chores off your plate, but most of the day is still yours.

Not the odds you keep your job. It's how much of the everyday work still needs a person, out of 100.

← Robot's turf Human's turf →

The ILO's official verdict: Not Exposed

214 of 427 for holding up against AI

Why this score?

The ILO rated each of this job's 12 tasks for how much of it AI could do. They average 27.1 out of 100, so it holds up at 100 − 27.1 = 72.9.

That's the whole sum. No black box, no secret sauce: you can check it against the ILO's study. ILO group “Not Exposed”: None of this job's tasks scored high enough to count.

This job rates 38.2 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Man v Bot · compare

Who holds up better?

Specialist medical practitioners 73

v

Go on, try your partner's job. Or your sibling's. We won't tell.

Man v Bot

Where the bot helps, and where the human wins

Bot

What AI takes

The routine stuff. You may not miss it.

  • Clinical notes, letters and records.
  • Literature review and research summaries.
  • Decision support for tests and diagnosis.

Man

What people still do better

Judgement, trust and skilled hands. Hard to download.

  • Examining and treating patients.
  • Surgery and procedures.
  • Difficult conversations and clinical judgement.

Both

What's arriving

New work that only exists because the AI does.

  • Checking AI-assisted diagnoses.
  • Working with AI imaging and pathology.
  • Rules on clinical AI use.

Written by a human, from the ILO's task ratings below. Yes, we see the irony. Read it as one person's take.

Meet your two rivals

They're not the same machine. AI software can only reach the parts of a job done on a screen or in words. A chatbot can't climb a ladder. A robot might, one day, if it doesn't fall off.

The AI

Lives in a screen. Never had to fix a boiler.

Threat level: Low

25 could do without you

It could take over very little of the work on its own. It could help with 66 of 100.

The robot

The wildcard. Has hands, still working out stairs.

How much it matters here: Lower

38 how hands-on

Not much of this job needs hands, so the robot can sit this one out.

So could a robot do the physical part?

Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.

Robots hate fiddly work in awkward spaces. On that measure, this job scores 34 out of 100. The higher it is, the longer the robot waits.

38 How
hands-on
34 How fiddly
and cramped

Kind of hands-on work Less than half hands-on

The small print

They aren't a robot score, and nothing on this page is. Nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to put a number on it. These are the closest thing we have: how hands-on the job is, and how much fiddly, cramped work it takes, which is what Frey and Osborne found hardest for machines.

From O*NET, averaged across 15 US jobs , so treat it as rough.

finger skill 40.6 · hand skill 33.3 · cramped spaces 27.1 · averaged · rule: hands-on under 50

estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.8-observed-use measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement

The job, task by task

Every job is really a bundle of tasks. Here's this one unpacked, with how much of each AI could do, out of 100. The score is the average, and averages can hide a lot.

AI's favourite task here scores 43, against an average of 27. The bigger the gap, the more lopsided the job: some of it wide open to AI, some of it barely touched.

  1. 43

    Providing information to patients and families and communities about preventive measures, treatment and care for specific ailments

    Low
  2. 39

    Conducting research into specific human disorders and illnesses and preventive or curative methods and disseminating the findings such as through scientific reports

    Low
  3. 38

    Reporting births, deaths and notifiable diseases to government authorities to meet legal and professional requirements

    Low
  4. 37

    Recording patients' medical information and exchanging information with other health professionals to ensure the provision of comprehensive care

    Low
  5. 35

    Planning and participating in programmes designed to prevent the occurrence and spread of specific diseases.

    Low
  6. 34

    Considering medical information provided by a referring doctor or other health care provider

    Low
  7. 28

    Ordering specialized diagnostic tests to determine the nature of disorders or illnesses

    Low
  8. 18

    Prescribing, administering and monitoring patients' responses to treatments, medications, anaesthetics, psychotherapies, physical rehabilitation programmes and other preventive and curative measures

    Very Low
  9. 17

    Conducting physical examinations of patients and interviewing them and their families to determine their health status

    Very Low
  10. 16

    Performing autopsies to determine cause of death

    Very Low
  11. 12

    Performing surgery of a general or specialized nature

    Very Low
  12. 11

    Managing complications before, during and after childbirth

    Very Low

12 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Sidekick or replacement?

A tool that makes you faster is a very different thing from one that does the task while you watch. Jobs and Skills Australia measured the two separately, which is handy.

AI helps you
66
AI does it for you
25

Sidekick wins, by 41 points.

How good a match is this?

5 Australian jobs match this one, and we've simply averaged them. Treat the numbers as a rough guide.

estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.8-observed-use matched to Australian jobs 2532, 2533, 2534, 2535, 2539

Meanwhile, in real life…

Everything else here is about what AI could do. This is what people actually did. When they asked Claude for help with this kind of work, did they hand the whole task over, or roll their sleeves up and work through it together?

Out of every 100 conversations

63
37

worked through it together handed it over

The small print

Anthropic publishes this about its own product, and it doesn't feed into any score here. These are people who use Claude, not workers in general, so little use here doesn't mean AI can't reach the job. This job makes up 0.27% of the conversations.

The data is sorted by US job, and this one matches 13 of them. We've combined them, counting each by how often it comes up in the conversations, so the busiest one counts most.

These two add up to 100. The bars elsewhere on the page don't, because each is scored on its own, so we don't put them side by side.

observed use Anthropic Economic Index release 2026-06-26, period beginning 2026-05-01 data 0.8-observed-use 2026-05-01 · Anthropic, about its own product

So, should specialist doctors be worried?

Short answer: not much. Some of the chores will change, and good riddance.

No, but the paperwork and information work are moving. Patient information, research, reporting, records, prevention programmes and reviewing referrals are the most exposed tasks, all Low; examining, treating and operating rate Very Low. AI will take on documentation and support diagnosis; clinical responsibility stays with doctors.

Worth remembering: we score tasks, not jobs. When AI takes on a task, the job usually reshuffles around it rather than vanishing.

Where this job could lead

How are the neighbours doing?

There are 92 jobs in the “Professionals” family, averaging 61. This one is above the family average.

Pit this against any other job →