Skip to content
man bot
Compare

Professionals · code 2635

Social work and counselling professionals

AI can write the court report. It can't earn a family's trust.

Seven of the eleven tasks are mostly out of AI's reach, including case reports and assessing clients' situations. Advising parole boards and investigating abuse or neglect it barely touches.

What they actually do (and what else they get called)

Social work and counselling professionals provide advice and guidance to individuals, families, groups, communities and organizations in response to social and personal difficulties. They assist clients to develop skills and access resources and support services needed to respond to issues arising from unemployment, poverty, disability, addiction, criminal and delinquent behaviour, marital and other problems. Tasks include - (a) interviewing clients individually, in families or in groups, to assess their situation and problems and determine the types of services required; (b) analysing the client’s situation and presenting alternative approaches to resolving problems; (c) compiling case records or reports for courts and other legal proceedings; (d) providing counselling, therapy and mediation services, and facilitating group sessions to assist clients to develop skills and insights needed to deal with and resolve their social and personal problems; (e) planning and implementing programmes of assistance for clients, including crisis intervention and referral to agencies that provide financial assistance, legal aid, housing, medical treatment and other services; (f) investigating cases of abuse or neglect and taking action to protect children and other persons at risk; (g) working with offenders during and after sentence to help them to integrate into the community and to change attitudes and behaviour in order to reduce further offending; (h) providing advice to prison governors and to probation and parole review boards that helps determine whether, and under what conditions, an offender should be incarcerated, released from prison or undergo alternative correctional measures; (i) acting as advocates for client groups in the community and lobbying for solutions to problems affecting them; (j) developing prevention and intervention programmes to meet community needs; (k) maintaining contact with other social service agencies, educational institutions and health care providers involved with clients to provide information and obtain feedback on clients’ overall situation and progress. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Addictions counsellor - Bereavement counsellor - Child and youth counsellor - District social welfare officer - Family counsellor - Marriage counsellor - Parole officer - Probation officer - Sexual assault counsellor - Social worker - Women’s welfare organizer Some related occupations classified elsewhere: - Psychologists - 2634 - Welfare support worker - 3412

  • social worker
  • social pedagogue
  • social counsellor

Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.

72 / 100

Mostly holds up against AI

AI can take a few chores off your plate, but most of the day is still yours.

Not the odds you keep your job. It's how much of the everyday work still needs a person, out of 100.

← Robot's turf Human's turf →

The ILO's official verdict: Not Exposed

227 of 427 for holding up against AI

Why this score?

The ILO rated each of this job's 11 tasks for how much of it AI could do. They average 28.3 out of 100, so it holds up at 100 − 28.3 = 71.7.

That's the whole sum. No black box, no secret sauce: you can check it against the ILO's study. ILO group “Not Exposed”: None of this job's tasks scored high enough to count.

This job rates 17.8 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Man v Bot · compare

Who holds up better?

Social work and counselling professionals 72

v

Go on, try your partner's job. Or your sibling's. We won't tell.

Man v Bot

Where the bot helps, and where the human wins

Bot

What AI takes

The routine stuff. You may not miss it.

  • Case notes and court reports.
  • Assessments and support plans.
  • Liaising with other agencies.

Man

What people still do better

Judgement, trust and skilled hands. Hard to download.

  • Counselling and building trust.
  • Protecting children and vulnerable adults.
  • Difficult decisions with incomplete information.

Both

What's arriving

New work that only exists because the AI does.

  • AI tools for case notes, with rules on their use.
  • Online counselling.
  • Supporting people affected by online harms.

Written by a human, from the ILO's task ratings below. Yes, we see the irony. Read it as one person's take.

Meet your two rivals

They're not the same machine. AI software can only reach the parts of a job done on a screen or in words. A chatbot can't climb a ladder. A robot might, one day, if it doesn't fall off.

The AI

Lives in a screen. Never had to fix a boiler.

Threat level: Medium

38 could do without you

It could take over some of the work, and help with more. It could help with 68 of 100.

The robot

The wildcard. Has hands, still working out stairs.

How much it matters here: Lower

18 how hands-on

Not much of this job needs hands, so the robot can sit this one out.

So could a robot do the physical part?

Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.

Robots hate fiddly work in awkward spaces. On that measure, this job scores 10 out of 100. The higher it is, the longer the robot waits.

18 How
hands-on
10 How fiddly
and cramped

Kind of hands-on work Less than half hands-on

The small print

They aren't a robot score, and nothing on this page is. Nobody measures how far robots have got well enough to put a number on it. These are the closest thing we have: how hands-on the job is, and how much fiddly, cramped work it takes, which is what Frey and Osborne found hardest for machines.

From O*NET, averaged across 8 US jobs , so treat it as rough.

finger skill 13.8 · hand skill 5.8 · cramped spaces 9.2 · averaged · rule: hands-on under 50

estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.8-observed-use measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement

The job, task by task

Every job is really a bundle of tasks. Here's this one unpacked, with how much of each AI could do, out of 100. The score is the average, and averages can hide a lot.

AI's favourite task here scores 46, against an average of 28. The bigger the gap, the more lopsided the job: some of it wide open to AI, some of it barely touched.

  1. 46

    Compiling case records or reports for courts and other legal proceedings

    Low
  2. 44

    Analysing the client's situation and presenting alternative approaches to resolving problems

    Low
  3. 34

    Planning and implementing programmes of assistance for clients including crisis intervention and referral to agencies that provide financial assistance, legal aid, housing, medical treatment and other services

    Low
  4. 31

    Acting as advocates for client groups in the community and lobbying for solutions to problems affecting them

    Low
  5. 30

    Developing prevention and intervention programmes to meet community needs

    Low
  6. 28

    Interviewing clients individually, in families, or in groups, to assess their situation and problems and determine the types of services required

    Low
  7. 26

    Maintaining contact with other social service agencies, educational institutions and health care providers involved with clients to provide information and obtain feedback on clients' overall situation and progress.

    Low
  8. 24

    Working with offenders during and after sentence, to help them to integrate into the community and to change attitudes and behaviour in order to reduce further offending

    Very Low
  9. 20

    Providing counselling, therapy and mediation services and facilitating group sessions to assist clients to develop skills and insights needed to deal with and resolve their social and personal problems

    Very Low
  10. 17

    Providing advice to prison governors and to probation and parole review boards that helps determine whether, and under what conditions, an offender should be incarcerated, released from prison or undergo alternative correctional measures

    Very Low
  11. 14

    Investigating cases of abuse or neglect and taking action to protect children and other at risk persons

    Very Low

11 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's

from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.8-observed-use

Sidekick or replacement?

A tool that makes you faster is a very different thing from one that does the task while you watch. Jobs and Skills Australia measured the two separately, which is handy.

AI helps you
68
AI does it for you
38

Sidekick wins, by 31 points.

How good a match is this?

4 Australian jobs match this one, and we've simply averaged them. Treat the numbers as a rough guide.

estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.8-observed-use matched to Australian jobs 2721, 2725, 2726, 4117

Meanwhile, in real life…

Everything else here is about what AI could do. This is what people actually did. When they asked Claude for help with this kind of work, did they hand the whole task over, or roll their sleeves up and work through it together?

Out of every 100 conversations

58
42

worked through it together handed it over

The small print

Anthropic publishes this about its own product, and it doesn't feed into any score here. These are people who use Claude, not workers in general, so little use here doesn't mean AI can't reach the job. This job makes up 1% of the conversations.

The data is sorted by US job, and this one matches 7 of them. We've combined them, counting each by how often it comes up in the conversations, so the busiest one counts most.

These two add up to 100. The bars elsewhere on the page don't, because each is scored on its own, so we don't put them side by side.

observed use Anthropic Economic Index release 2026-06-26, period beginning 2026-05-01 data 0.8-observed-use 2026-05-01 · Anthropic, about its own product

So, should social workers and counsellors be worried?

Short answer: not much. Some of the chores will change, and good riddance.

The paperwork is moving. Case records, analysing situations, planning support, advocacy, prevention programmes, interviews and liaising rate Low; counselling, working with offenders and protecting children rate Very Low. AI could cut the documentation load; the work with people stays human.

Worth remembering: we score tasks, not jobs. When AI takes on a task, the job usually reshuffles around it rather than vanishing.

Where this job could lead

None of the new jobs we've written up start from here yet. Could be you're the first. See the jobs AI is creating →

How are the neighbours doing?

There are 92 jobs in the “Professionals” family, averaging 61. This one is above the family average.

Pit this against any other job →