Professionals · code 2164
Town and traffic planners
Town and traffic planners develop and implement plans and policies for the controlled use of urban and rural land and for traffic systems. They conduct research and provide advice on economic, environmental and social factors affecting land use and traffic flows. Tasks include - (a) planning layout and coordinating development of urban areas; (b) compiling and analysing data on economic, legal, political, cultural, demographic, sociological, physical and environmental factors affecting land use; (c) conferring with government authorities, communities and specialists in fields such as architecture, planning, social science, the environment and the law; (d) devising and recommending use and development of land, and presenting narrative and graphic plans, programmes and designs to groups and individuals; (e) advising governments, companies and communities on urban and regional planning issues and proposals; (f) reviewing and evaluating environmental impact reports; (g) planning and coordinating the development of land areas for parks, schools, institutions, airports, roadways and related projects, and for commercial, industrial and residential sites; (h) planning and advising on routing and control of road traffic and public transportation systems for efficiency and safety. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Land planner - Traffic planner - Urban planner Some related occupations classified elsewhere: - Building architect - 2161 - Landscape architect - 2162
A few tasks are affected, but the heart of the job isn't. It ranks 331 of 427 for holding up against AI.
Also known as
- urban planner
- transport planner
- land planner
Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.
against AI Minimal Exposure
AI could take on 40.8 of 100, on average
so it holds up at 100 − 40.8 = 59.2
That's the whole sum, and you can check it against the ILO's study.
out of 100
From O*NET, matched to one US job
and cramped
finger skill 25 · hand skill 0 · cramped spaces 2 · averaged
Kind of hands-on work · hands-on under 50 Less than half hands-on
Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.
estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.7-work-setting measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
What this number leaves out This job rates 9 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.
The tasks behind the score
The score is the average of these. A job is really a bundle of tasks, and an average can hide how uneven that bundle is.
The task AI could do most of scores 51.3, while the average is 40.8. A big gap means some of this job is wide open to AI and some of it barely at all. That's quite different from a job where everything sits somewhere in the middle, even when the averages match.
- 51.3
Planning and advising on routing and control of road traffic and public transportation systems for efficiency and safety.
Medium - 44
Compiling and analysing data on economic, legal, political, cultural, demographic, sociological, physical and environmental factors affecting land use
Low - 42
Reviewing and evaluating environmental impact reports
Low - 41.8
Advising governments, companies and communities on urban and regional planning issues and proposals
Low - 41.5
Devising and recommending use and development of land, and presenting narrative and graphic plans, programmes and designs to groups and individuals
Low - 39
Planning layout and coordinating development of urban areas
Low - 34
Planning and coordinating the development of land areas for parks, schools, institutions, airports, roadways and related projects, and for commercial, industrial and residential sites
Low - 33
Conferring with government authorities, communities and specialists in fields such as architecture, planning, social science the environment and the law
Low
8 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.7-work-setting
Helped, or replaced?
The score above can't tell a tool that makes you faster from one that does the task instead of you. Jobs and Skills Australia looked at those two things separately, and this is their result, matched to this job.
One Australian job matches this one closely, so this is about as reliable as it gets here.
- AI helps you
- 71
- AI does it for you
- 45
Helping wins by 26 points.
estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.7-work-setting matched to Australian jobs 2326
Compared with similar jobs
There are 92 jobs in the “Professionals” group, averaging 61.4. This one is below that.
- Creative and performing artists not e… 87.1
- Veterinarians 85.8
- Dentists 85.1
- Religious professionals 83.4
- Dancers and choreographers 80.6
- Health professionals not elsewhere cl… 80.5
- Early childhood educators 79.2
- Visual artists 79
- Paramedical practitioners 76.7
- Optometrists and ophthalmic opticians 76.3
- Audiologists and speech therapists 76.2
- Nursing professionals 74.8
- Primary school teachers 73.9
- Specialist medical practitioners 72.9
- Environmental and occupational health… 72
- Musicians, singers and composers 72
- Social work and counselling professio… 71.7
- Physiotherapists 71.6
- Special needs teachers 71.6
- Farming, forestry and fisheries advis… 71.5
- Generalist medical practitioners 71.3
- Mining engineers, metallurgists and r… 70.7
- Secondary education teachers 70.2
- Midwifery professionals 70.1
- Civil engineers 69.8
- Engineering professionals not elsewhe… 69.5
- Judges 68.7
- Electrical engineers 68.6