Professionals · code 2265
Dieticians and nutritionists
Dieticians and nutritionists assess, plan and implement programmes to enhance the impact of food and nutrition on human health. Tasks include - (a) instructing individuals, families and communities on nutrition, the planning of diets and preparation of food to maximize health benefits and reduce potential risks to health; (b) planning diets and menus, supervising the preparation and serving of meals, and monitoring food intake and quality to provide nutritional care in settings offering food services; (c) compiling and assessing data relating to health and nutritional status of individuals, groups and communities based on nutritional values of food served or consumed; (d) planning and conducting nutrition assessments, intervention programmes, and education and training to improve nutritional levels among individuals and communities; (e) consulting with other health professionals and care providers to manage the dietary and nutritional needs of patients; (f) developing and evaluating food and nutrition products to meet nutritional requirements; (g) conducting research on nutrition and disseminating the findings at scientific conferences and in other settings. Examples of the occupations classified here: - Clinical dietician - Food service dietician - Nutritionist - Public health nutritionist - Sports nutritionist
A few tasks are affected, but the heart of the job isn't. It ranks 334 of 427 for holding up against AI.
Also known as
- dietitian
Job titles from the EU's ESCO list. Search for any of them on the jobs page and you'll end up here.
against AI Minimal Exposure
AI could take on 41.4 of 100, on average
so it holds up at 100 − 41.4 = 58.6
That's the whole sum, and you can check it against the ILO's study.
out of 100
From O*NET, matched to one US job
and cramped
finger skill 23.1 · hand skill 3.6 · cramped spaces 5 · averaged
Kind of hands-on work · hands-on under 50 Less than half hands-on
Less than half of this job is hands-on. Robots still matter, but for a smaller part of the work, so we don't sort it any further.
estimated O*NET 31.0 BLS occupational crosswalk chain ISCO-08 to 2010 SOC (Aug 2012, rev. Jun 2015); 2010 to 2018 SOC (Nov 2017); O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy data 0.7-work-setting measures chosen by Frey & Osborne (2017) · the grouping is a sorting, not a measurement
What this number leaves out This job rates 15.6 out of 100 for how hands-on it is. The score above only looks at AI tools, not robots, but for work this far from the physical that matters less.
The tasks behind the score
The score is the average of these. A job is really a bundle of tasks, and an average can hide how uneven that bundle is.
The task AI could do most of scores 56.5, while the average is 41.4. A big gap means some of this job is wide open to AI and some of it barely at all. That's quite different from a job where everything sits somewhere in the middle, even when the averages match.
- 56.5
Conducting research on nutrition and disseminating the findings at scientific conferences and in other settings.
Medium - 41.5
Planning diets and menus, supervising the preparation and serving of meals, and monitoring food intake and quality to provide nutritional care in settings offering food services
Low - 41.5
Developing and evaluating food and nutrition products to meet nutritional requirements
Low - 40
Planning and conducting nutrition assessments, intervention programmes, and education and training to improve nutritional levels among individuals and communities
Low - 40
Consulting with other health professionals and care providers to manage the dietary and nutritional needs of patients
Low - 36.5
Compiling and assessing data relating to health and nutritional status of individuals, groups and communities based on nutritional values of food served or consumed
Low - 33.8
Instructing individuals, families and communities on nutrition, the planning of diets and preparation of food to maximize health benefits and reduce potential risks to health
Low
7 tasks · the High to Very Low labels are the ILO's
from the source Working Paper 140, Generative AI and Jobs 2025 index data 0.7-work-setting
Helped, or replaced?
The score above can't tell a tool that makes you faster from one that does the task instead of you. Jobs and Skills Australia looked at those two things separately, and this is their result, matched to this job.
One Australian job matches, but only partly: not everyone in it does this job. Treat the numbers as a rough guide.
- AI helps you
- 76
- AI does it for you
- 40
Helping wins by 36 points.
estimated Our Gen AI Transition (Gen AI Capacity Study) September 2025 detailed data release data 0.7-work-setting matched to Australian jobs 2511
Compared with similar jobs
There are 92 jobs in the “Professionals” group, averaging 61.4. This one is below that.
- Creative and performing artists not e… 87.1
- Veterinarians 85.8
- Dentists 85.1
- Religious professionals 83.4
- Dancers and choreographers 80.6
- Health professionals not elsewhere cl… 80.5
- Early childhood educators 79.2
- Visual artists 79
- Paramedical practitioners 76.7
- Optometrists and ophthalmic opticians 76.3
- Audiologists and speech therapists 76.2
- Nursing professionals 74.8
- Primary school teachers 73.9
- Specialist medical practitioners 72.9
- Environmental and occupational health… 72
- Musicians, singers and composers 72
- Social work and counselling professio… 71.7
- Physiotherapists 71.6
- Special needs teachers 71.6
- Farming, forestry and fisheries advis… 71.5
- Generalist medical practitioners 71.3
- Mining engineers, metallurgists and r… 70.7
- Secondary education teachers 70.2
- Midwifery professionals 70.1
- Civil engineers 69.8
- Engineering professionals not elsewhe… 69.5
- Judges 68.7
- Electrical engineers 68.6